Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 400 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 13 HP more power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.6 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 140 litres more trunk space than the Rover 400. The Rover 400 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |