Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 200 1990

 
Seat Toledo
1991 - 1994
Rover 200
1990 - 1995
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP112 HP
Torque: 160 NM138 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds9.5 seconds
Seat Toledo engine produces 13 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Rover 200. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.6
Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1000 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.22 m
Width: 1.66 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.40 m
Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres352 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1360 litresno data
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Toledo has 198 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`580
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 400no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv