Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 200 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 13 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Rover 200. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.6 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |