Seat Toledo 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 133 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 143 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 11.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Volvo 960) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 55 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 59 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 960. The Volvo 960 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |