Seat Toledo 1991 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 65 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.5 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 47 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | 830 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Toledo (by 530 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`495 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Opel Omega has
| |