Seat Toledo 1991 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 46 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 38 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |