Seat Toledo 1991 vs Toyota Starlet 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 124 NM | 101 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Toyota Starlet is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP less power than Toyota Starlet, but torque is 23 NM more than Toyota Starlet. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.3 | |
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Starlet, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 3.72 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 60 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 1.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | high | |
Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |