Seat Toledo 1991 vs BMW 3 series 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 31 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 26 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |