Seat Toledo 1995 vs Opel Vectra 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 14 HP more power than Opel Vectra, but torque is 5 NM less than Opel Vectra. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Vectra is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Vectra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Omega, Opel Calibra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Vectra, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Vectra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Opel Vectra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Vectra, so Opel Vectra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Opel Vectra has
| |