Seat Toledo 1995 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Bora, Volkswagen Beetle | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 19 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1330 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Octavia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Skoda Octavia, so Skoda Octavia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |