Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 200 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 5 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Rover 200. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 25 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1995 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 35 cm longer than the Rover 200, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 200 has
| |