Seat Toledo 1997 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 24 HP more power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |