Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 400 1996

 
Seat Toledo
1995 - 1999
Rover 400
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP86 HP
Torque: 202 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds14 seconds
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Rover 400. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.7
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1270 km on highway1240 km on highway
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Audi A6, Volkswagen Vento, Seat AlhambraUsed also on Rover 200
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.32 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Seat Toledo and Rover 400 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data720 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`720
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv