Seat Toledo 1995 vs Rover 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Rover 200. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 600'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Sharan, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 35 cm longer than the Rover 200, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |