Seat Toledo 1995 vs Volvo S40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 38 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 16 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volvo S40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 380 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S40 has
| |