Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 64 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 124 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 51 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 141 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`795 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |