Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 12 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.8 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Felicia | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Toledo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 38 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |