Seat Toledo 1995 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Lantra, but torque is 4 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 10 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 393 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai Lantra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Lantra, so Hyundai Lantra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |