Seat Toledo 1995 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 306 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 26 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 81 NM less than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Felicia | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 306, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 463 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 306 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 306, so Peugeot 306 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |