Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 52 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.0 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |