Seat Toledo 1995 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Kia Sephia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 16 HP less power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Kia Sephia. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 7 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Kia Sephia, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |