Seat Toledo 1996 vs Renault Megane 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 6 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Modus | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 16 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |