Seat Toledo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but higher. Seat Toledo is 24 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Toledo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Seat Toledo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |