Seat Toledo 1996 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Neon is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 32 HP less power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Chrysler Neon. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Stratus, Dodge Neon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Neon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but higher. Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Neon, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 186 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. The Chrysler Neon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |