Seat Toledo 1996 vs Mazda 323 1998

 
Seat Toledo
1996 - 1999
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 101 HP88 HP
Torque: 140 NM132 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds11.9 seconds
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive.
Seat Toledo engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.87.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.9 l/100km7.7 l/100km
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway870 km on highway
690 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.20 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Seat Toledo is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data355 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1000 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 323.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`625
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

high
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 323 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv