Seat Toledo 1996 vs Kia Shuma 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 13 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Kia Shuma. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Kia Sephia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 16 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 780 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |