Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mazda 323 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 134 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
Seat Toledo is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`575 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 323 has
| |