Seat Toledo 1995 vs Mazda 323 1994

 
Seat Toledo
1995 - 1999
Mazda 323
1994 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 125 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds11.9 seconds
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.37.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km7.7 l/100km
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway910 km on highway
670 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.24 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.36 m
Seat Toledo is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data300 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 323.
Gross weight (kg): 1`0001`575
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Mazda 323 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 323 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv