Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo V40, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 55 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Seat Toledo has 269 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the Seat Toledo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |