Seat Toledo 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 17 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, but torque is 50 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 55 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space. Seat Toledo has 495 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |