Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 226 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |