Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 Cross Country 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo V40 Cross Country, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Volvo V40 Cross Country. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40 Cross Country, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40 Cross Country, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 324 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 226 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40 Cross Country. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo V40 Cross Country. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 Cross Country has
| |