Seat Toledo 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |