Seat Toledo 2013 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 19 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 14 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Fabia, Seat Altea, Skoda Yeti | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Caddy, Skoda Fabia, Audi A1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. Skoda Octavia 2013 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifespan is relatively low. There tends to be increased vibration at idling speed. Problems with the fuel pressure pump may be the first sign of a petrol smell in the oil. ... More about Skoda Octavia 2013 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 18 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 590 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1580 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Seat Toledo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |