Seat Toledo 2013 vs Volvo V40 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.6 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 215 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |