Seat Toledo 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Toledo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Rapid) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 3.8 | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |