Seat Toledo 2013 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 47 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 88 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Rapid 2012 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo and Skoda Rapid are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1490 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |