Seat Toledo 2013 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Nissan Pulsar. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.52 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 385 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 165 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |