Seat Toledo 2013 vs Mazda 3 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 75 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 186 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |