Seat Toledo 2013 vs Mazda 3 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Seat Toledo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda 3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1263 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 186 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`595 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`135 kg | 1`285 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 615 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |