Seat Toledo 2013 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Seat Toledo
2013 -
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP165 HP
Torque: 112 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds8.2 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 90 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.8
Seat Toledo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1060 km on highway
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.47 m
Width: 1.71 m1.80 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1334 litres
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Toledo has 186 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5951`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10 20010 400
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv