Seat Toledo 2017 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 42 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 11 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Seat Toledo has 226 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 10 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`650 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |