Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Despite less power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 35 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |