Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 400 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 21 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Rover 400 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 1`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 435 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Rover 400. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 400 has
| |