Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 200 1993
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 85 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 352 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 198 litres more trunk space than the Rover 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 1`215 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 400 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Rover 200. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 200 has
| |