Seat Toledo 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 56 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 393 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |