Seat Toledo 2001 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 20 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, but torque is 3 NM more than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 380 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Seat Toledo has 120 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`821 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`386 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 435 kg | 500 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Alfa Romeo 156. Therefore, Alfa Romeo 156 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |