Seat Toledo 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Seat Toledo
1999 - 2000
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP190 HP
Torque: 210 NM222 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds7.3 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 40 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.311.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.7 l/100km11.2 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway750 km on highway
560 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.43 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres380 litres
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Toledo has 120 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`805 kg1`850 kg
Net weight:1`305 kg1`350 kg
Load capacity:500 kg500 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Seat Toledo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv