Seat Toledo 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 42 HP more power than Hyundai Lantra, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |