Seat Toledo 1999 vs Hyundai Lantra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Toledo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Lantra) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai Lantra, but torque is 90 NM more than Hyundai Lantra. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Lantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A6, Seat Alhambra, Seat Leon | Used also on Hyundai Coupe | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 1 cm shorter than the Hyundai Lantra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai Lantra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`785 kg | 1`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Lantra has
| |