Seat Toledo 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 156 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 40 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 378 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Alfa Romeo 156 has
| |