Seat Toledo 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Seat Toledo
1999 - 2004
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP105 HP
Torque: 210 NM255 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds10.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.8
Real fuel consumption: 5.7 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1070 km in combined cycle1080 km in combined cycle
1300 km on highway1340 km on highway
960 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.44 m4.43 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.44 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 156, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres380 litres
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity.
Seat Toledo has 120 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`770 kg1`770 kg
Net weight:1`245 kg1`270 kg
Load capacity:525 kg500 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Seat Toledo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 156 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001000
Pros and Cons: Seat Toledo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv